Special Needs Resources

Read more Special Needs news coverage here. 


Disability Definitions | Federal Laws | Resources on Service Animals |
Transportation of Homeless Students

Disability Definitions

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, as amended, identifies 13 specific disabilities. They range from autism to orthopedic impairments to visual impairments.

Listed here are descriptions of these disability terms developed by the 14th National Conference on School Transportation and published in the Final Recommendations of the Conference in the National School Transportation Specifications & Procedures, 2005 Revised Edition, pages 358-360. This NCST document is considered a definitive resource on transportation principles. Information on where to obtain the publication is provided at the bottom of this page.

Meanwhile, detailed information about the 13 disabilities can also be found at the National Information Center for Children and Youth Web site. Disability Fact Sheets and Briefing Papers cover the definition, incidence, characteristics and educational implications about each of the following conditions, plus more.

  • Autism means: 1) A developmental disability significantly affecting verbal and non-verbal communication and social interaction, generally evident before age 3, that adversely affects a child’s educational performance. Other characteristics often associated with autism are engagement in repetitive activities and stereotyped movements, resistance to environmental change or change in daily routines, and unusual responses to sensory experiences. The term does not apply if a child’s educational performance is adversely affected primarily because the child has an emotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (b)(4) of this section 300.7 to 300.18.2) A child who manifests the characteristics of autism after age 3 could be diagnosed as having autism if the criteria in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of section 300.7 to 300.18 are satisfied.
  • Deaf-blindness means concomitant hearing and visual impairments, the combination of which causes such severe communication and other developmental and educational needs that they cannot be accommodated in special education programs solely for children with deafness or children with blindness.

 

  • Deafness means a hearing impairment that is so severe the child is impaired in processing linguistic information through hearing, with or without amplification, that adversely affects a child’s educational performance.

 

  • Emotional disturbance is defined as follows:
    • The term means a condition exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics over a long period of time and to a marked degree that adversely affects a child’s educational performance:
    • An inability to learn that cannot be explained by intellectual, sensory or health factors.
    • An inability to build or maintain satisfactory interpersonal relationships with peers and teachers.
    • Inappropriate types of behavior or feelings under normal circumstances.
    • A general, pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression.
    • A tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears associated with personal or school problems
    • The term includes schizophrenia. The term does not apply to children who are socially maladjusted, unless it is determined that they have an emotional disturbance.

 

  • Hearing impairment means an impairment in hearing, whether permanent or fluctuating, that adversely affects a child’s educational performance but that is not included under the definition of deafness in this section.

 

  • Mental retardation means significantly sub-average general intellectual functioning, existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior and manifested during the developmental period, which adversely affects a child’s educational performance.

 

  • Multiple disabilities means concomitant impairments (such as mental retardation-blindness, mental retardation-orthopedic impairment, etc.), the combination of which causes such severe educational needs that they cannot be accommodated in special education programs solely for one of the impairments. The term does not include deaf-blindness.

 

  • Orthopedic impairment means a severe orthopedic impairment that adversely affects a child’s educational performance. The term includes impairments caused by congenital anomaly (e.g., clubfoot, absence of some member, etc.), impairments caused be disease (e.g., poliomyelitis, bone tuberculosis, etc.), and impairments from other causes (e.g., cerebral palsy, amputations, and fractures or burns that cause contractures).

 

  • Other health impairment means having limited strength, vitality or alertness, including a heightened alertness to environmental stimuli, that results in limited alertness with respect to the educational environment, that: is due to chronic or acute health problems such as asthma, attention deficit disorder (ADD) or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), diabetes, epilepsy, a heart condition, hemophilia, lead poisoning, leukemia, nephritis, rheumatic fever, and sickle cell anemia; and adversely affects a child’s educational performance.

 

  • Specific learning disability is defined as follows:
    The term means a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, that may manifest itself in an imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or to perform mathematical calculations, including conditions such as perceptual disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia and developmental aphasia.The term does not include learning problems that are primarily the result of visual, hearing, or motor disabilities, of mental retardation, of emotional disturbance or of environmental, cultural or economic disadvantage.

 

  • Speech or language impairment means a communication disorder, such as stuttering, impaired articulation, a language impairment, or a voice impairment, that adversely affects a child’s educational performance.

 

  • Traumatic brain injury means an acquired injury to the brain caused by an external physical force, resulting in total or partial functional disability or psychosocial impairment, or both, that adversely affects a child’s educational performance. The term applies to open or closed head injuries resulting in impairments in one or more areas, such as cognition; language; memory; attention; reasoning; abstract thinking; judgment; problem-solving; sensory, perceptual, and motor abilities; psychosocial behavior; physical functions; information processing; and speech. The term does not apply to brain injuries that are congenital or degenerative, or to brain injuries induced by birth trauma.

 

  • Visual impairment, including blindness, means impairment in vision that, even with correction, adversely affects a child’s educational performance. The term includes both partial sight and blindness.

Federal Laws

SAFETEA-LU: The reauthorization of the federal highway bill enacted in August 2005 added a provision (49 USC 30112) that outlaws the nation’s public schools from purchasing or leasing a non-conforming van for use in pupil transportation services. States may now lose federal highway safety funds if residing schools are discovered to be in violation. SAFETEA-LU expired at the end of September 2009, and Congress passed a half-dozen extensions to keep federal funding of state transportation and highway infrastructure funds flowing. A new reauthorization was expected by fall 2011.

Federal Law on Nonconforming Vans: 49 USC 301 outlining the prohibitions on manufacturing, selling, and importing noncomplying motor vehicles and equipment.

School Bus Safety Act of 2001: Proposed law in the 107th Congress by Rep. Mark Udall (R-CO) to prohibit the purchase, rent, or lease, for use as a schoolbus, of a motor vehicle that does not comply with motor vehicle safety standards that apply to schoolbuses, and for other purposes. The purpose of the law is to ban the use of non-conforming vans in school transportation use. Status: Enacted in SAFETEA-LU


Resources on Service Animals

By federal law in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a service dog or miniature horse (not a pony) is allowed access to any environment where a child with a disability is allowed access, such as schools, school buses, parks, doctor’s offices, restaurants, beaches, movie theaters, etc. And while the dog or miniature horse may go out on occasion without the child, the child does not go anywhere without his or her service dog. Time together solidifies the relationship, keeps skills sharp, and helps the child grow in life skills—time together is not only permissible, but necessary.

Source: Autism Service Dogs of America

What the Law Says

ADA 2010 Revised Requirements – Service Animals

Highlights of the Final Rule to Amend the Department of Justice’s Regulation Implementing Title II of the ADA (5. Service Animals)

Office for Civil Rights: Protecting Students with Disabilities FAQs

National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities – Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

Organizations That Can Help

Paws for Ability

Autism Service Dogs of America

Children’s Disabilities Information – Pros & Cons of Service Dogs

Disaboom Directory of Organizations

Easter Seals Project ACTION

Merlin’s Kids: Animals & Children Helping Each Other

National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities

The Service Dog Institute

Expert Advice

The late Melinda Jacobs, Esq. reviewed the following legal cases involving service animals on school buses during the 2016 TSD Conference in Louisville, Kentucky. Jacobs was an attorney based out of Knoxville, Tennessee, who specialized in special education law and authored Service Animals in the Schools: What Every District Needs to Know About the ADA Rules, published by LRP.

Alboniga ex rel. A.M. v. Sch. Bd. of Broward County, Fla., 65 IDELR 6 (S.D. Fla. 2015).
A federal court ordered the school district to permit a 6-year-old boy with multiple disabilities to bring his service dog, “Stevie,” to school. “Stevie” is trained to assist the child in the event of a seizure or medical emergency (lay across the child’s lap in case of a seizure; keep the child’s head up to prevent choking during a seizure);
during outbursts (providing sensory input to help calm the child); and to alert adults if the child experiences a medical crisis (activating a sensor mat, jumping on a mat to set off an alarm, going for help, or getting the attention of an adult). The school district required the parent to provide proof of liability insurance and an adult assistant to walk “Stevie” on bathroom breaks and to provide “handling” (the child is not capable of handling his own service dog). The parent objected to these requests and filed this lawsuit against the district. The court held that the school district was required to provide an adult handler as a “reasonable accommodation” for the child, and that the district could not require the parent to obtain liability insurance to hold the district harmless for any injury caused by “Stevie.” The court also reasoned that the child was “in control of” his service dog due to the fact that the dog was constantly tethered to the child’s wheelchair while at school (and even though the child was physically and mentally incapable of “handling” or “controlling” his service dog). The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a “Statement of Interest” in support of the parent and child in this case.

E.F. by Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools, 65 IDELR 221, 788 F.3d 622 (6th Cir. 2015).
The Sixth Circuit ruled that the arguments made by the parents of a young girl with spastic quadriplegic palsy were “crucially linked” to her education, and must be exhausted under the IDEA prior to pursuing a federal lawsuit under Section 504/Title II. The parents of the child sought the right to have a service dog, a hybrid golden-doodle named “Wonder,” accompany their daughter to school. The school district argued that the child’s educational needs were being met with the provision of a 1:1 adult aide, and that the service animal was not necessary for the child to receive FAPE. The parents argued that the right to have a service dog accompany their daughter at school is guaranteed by Title II/Section 504, and is separate and distinct from their daughter’s rights pursuant to the IDEA. The court (2-1 decision) held that the arguments advanced by the parents in support of the service animal (to increase the child’s independence and mobility) were related to the provision of education services, and were subject to the IDEA’s exhaustion requirements.

C.C. by Ciriacks v. Cypress Sch. Dist., 56 IDELR 295 (C.D. Cal. 2011).
The court ordered the school district to permit a six-year-old boy with autism to bring his service dog, “Eddy,” to school. The dog was specially trained to calm the boy to reduce his self-stimulating (“stimming” or “stereotypic”) and aggressive behaviors as well as eloping. Even though the school district would have to assign an aide to learn how to issue commands to the dog, provide the dog with water, and tether/untether the animal occasionally, these concerns did not amount to a “fundamental alteration” of the program or services provided by the district. These functions/responsibilities were merely “reasonable accommodations” required by Section 504/Title II.

Gates-Chili Cent. Sch. Dist., 65 IDELR 152 (DOJ 2015).
A New York school district violated Section 504/Title II when it refused to provide “reasonable accommodations” to assist an elementary student with disabilities in handling her service animals. This student is nonverbal, and is diagnosed with Angelman syndrome, autism, epilepsy, asthma, and hypotonia. The child’s mother paid more than $40,000 over four years for an adult handler for her child’s service dog. The child was also provided with an adult aide by the school district, but this aide was not permitted to handle the dog. DOJ found that the district’s refusal to provide an aide to assist the child in handling her dog was a violation of law. This type of service constituted a “reasonable accommodation” that is required by Section 504/Title II.


Transportation of Homeless Students

Federal law protects students nationwide who lack a fixed, regular and adequate nighttime residence by requiring school district provide them a free, public education no matter where they have moved temporarily. It is called the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, which was first passed in 1987 and has been revised several times since, most recently in 2002.

This law requires that school district ensure any student who becomes homeless during any given school year retains the right access to his or her school of origin, if that is in the student’s best interest, no matter where the student and his or her family or guardian seeks temporary shelter. This includes temporary shelters, hotels motels, trailer parks, campgrounds, foster homes, or children who are abandoned in hospitals. Other settings include children living in cars, parks, public spaces, abandoned buildings, sub-standard housing, and bus or train stations. McKinney-Vento states that children and youth are essentially considered homeless if their primary nighttime residence is a “public or private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings.” The law also applies to migrant children who qualify as homeless and “unaccompanied youth” who are not in the physical custody of a parent or guardian.

According to McKinney-Vento:

“The State and its local educational agencies will adopt policies and practices to ensure transportation is provided.”

The National Association for the Education of Homeless Children and Youth states that, once a student’s best interest is met in with regard to school of origin, and dependent upon the parent’s or guardian’s wishes, school districts are required to provide transportation services to and from that school of origin for the remainder of the given school year. The determination of best interest is a case-by-case, child-centered and individualized decision but the requirement to transport is unambiguous and unqualified. School districts, therefore, do not have the discretion of whether or not to provide transportation to the school of origin.

School transportation services for homeless students have widely become viewed as a related element of “special needs transportation.” Like with the transportation of students with disabilities, homeless transportation can be a very expensive operation for school districts, especially when ensuring transportation to a school of origin that could require long rides in school buses or other vehicles. Because all schools are bound by this law, districts are encouraged to enter into agreements with their neighbors to provide this transportation across city, county and sometimes even state lines.