Advertisement
HomeBlogsNorth Carolina: Out with Thomas and in with Blue Bird?

North Carolina: Out with Thomas and in with Blue Bird?

Though a final decision is pending, North Carolina appears to be set to award its 2010 bus bid to Blue Bird, marking an about face from a historic alliance with Thomas Built Buses. Not only is Thomas an in-state company but the way North Carolina’s school bus specs were written called for items that Thomas was in the best position to provide, according to industry sources and Internet message boards.
North Carolina amended its bus specs in early September to make them more general to all three large bus manufacturers, with IC Bus rounding out that list. Thomas Built’s president, John O’Leary, told local reporters this week that the development won’t hurt the company’s bottom line as 95 percent of bus sales occur out of state, anyway. As he told the local FOX News affiliate:

“We could’ve gone, ultimately, as low as Bluebird went. It would’ve been very irresponsible from our standpoint … It’s just getting down in the mud and wrestling around in that zero-profit game is not where we want to be.”

Low bids are commonplace in the school bus industry, as schools nationwide must remain on constant watch to make sure they stay within if not under budget, especially in the current environment of no less than 48 states running deficits. But this represents an interesting turn of events, especially in light of published reports of struggles at Blue Bird’s parent company Cerberus, which saw about half of its investors walk over the summer amid concerns over the company’s position in the current marketplace and the decision to embrace a new hedge fund. Those that balked and walked reportedly took with them about $4 billion.

Blue Bird reps have said the company remains strong, but obviously the company seriously underbid its buses in comparison to what Thomas was able to offer for its C2 Saf-T-Liners. And the result is a backlash in North Carolina, where residents view the decision to contract with a Georgia-based company as a heretical move when state unemployment rates are hovering around 10.7 percent, one of the worst in the country. The local North Carolina FOX affiliate also reported that some Thomas workers were wondering aloud why the state doesn’t require school systems to buy from in-state companies, since profits at North Carolina companies help keep workers employed. O’Leary said he understands that thinking, but points out he wouldn’t want Georgia or Illinois to do the same thing. Plus, something that is not mentioned, Thomas uses many third-party suppliers for such things as mirrors that are manufactured out of state. So why should the actual bus be any different?

Proof in point that today’s economy is making an already ultra-competitive school bus marketplace much more stiff.

Advertisement
Advertisement

November 2024

Meet the 2024 Transportation Director of the Year, Craig Beaver, director of transportation at Beaverton School District in Oregon....
Advertisement

Buyer’s Guide 2024

Find the latest vehicle production data and budget reports, industry trends, and contact information for state, national and federal...
Advertisement

Poll

Does your operation provide staff with end of the year performance evaluations?
49 votes
VoteResults
Advertisement